Live, scanning the open webAI Visibility Audit Platform
AI Visibility Audit Platform · Sample report

Sample AI Visibility Audit

A real report from AudFlo, the AI Visibility Audit Platform for founders: your AI Visibility Score, the blockers holding you back, and the copy-paste fixes that move the number.

Illustrative example using a representative site and numbers. Your scan returns your own real results in the same format.

AI Visibility Score
52/100

Below recommendable

Recommendation Status
Not yet recommended

AI engines are picking competitors instead.

Top Blocker
No category statement in the H1

Structural Understanding · High

What happened next

Before

52

Fixes applied

  • 1. Homepage headline rewrite
  • 2. FAQ + schema added

After

68

+16 points, up one rank

After-score is illustrative. Real results vary by site and by which fixes you apply.

In every report

What you receive

Every scan returns the same report you see below. Here is what is in it.

Your AI Visibility Score and rank

A single number out of 100, plus where it places you across the four ranks.

All 5 blockers, ranked by impact

The specific gaps costing you AI recommendations, each with the evidence behind it.

The pillar-by-pillar breakdown

How you score across Technical Visibility, Structural Understanding, Answer Selection, and Authority Signals.

Copy-paste Fix Pack prompts

The free scan generates the homepage headline rewrite. Pro generates every Fix Pack asset, built for your exact builder.

Authority Growth opportunities

Where to build the external signals AI engines cite: missing citations, comparisons, reviews, directories, and founder communities. See the preview lower on this page.

The subject

The scanned site

  • Sitenotetaker-ai.example.com
  • CategoryAI meeting-notes tool
  • BuilderLovable
  • AI Visibility Score52 / 100
  • RankBelow recommendable (45 to 64)
  • Scan date06 Jun 2026

The four ranks are described in the AudFlo Methodology. A score below 45 means AI engines cannot reliably reach or classify the site. A score of 80 or above means AI engines surface it consistently for relevant queries.

32 Checks, four pillars

Pillar-by-pillar breakdown

Each pillar covers 8 of the 32 Checks. Here is what AudFlo checked, what passed, and what failed.

71

Technical Visibility

Weight 20% of score

✓ Passedrobots.txt present, sitemap reachable, HTTPS valid

× FailedNo llms.txt, only one schema type detected

44

Structural Understanding

Weight 30% of score

✓ PassedSingle clear H1, readable language

× FailedNo category statement in the H1, target buyer not named in hero

38

Answer Selection

Weight 30% of score

✓ PassedA few question-shaped headings

× FailedNo FAQ schema, no dedicated FAQ page, no comparison content

55

Authority Signals

Weight 20% of score

✓ PassedTestimonials present on homepage

× FailedTestimonials lack named attribution, no Person or Organization schema, no founder page

Ranked by impact

Top 5 blockers

AudFlo ranks every gap by how much it is costing you in AI recommendations and surfaces the five that matter most. Each one explains what it means for you and what to do about it.

1.
HighStructural Understanding

No category statement in the H1

Why it mattersThe headline says "Never take notes again" but never says what the product is or who it is for. When ChatGPT reads that, it cannot tell what category you are in, so it cannot recommend you for it. Fix: say what you are and who you serve in the first line.

2.
HighAnswer Selection

No FAQ schema or FAQ page

Why it mattersThere is no FAQ anywhere on the site. So when a buyer asks ChatGPT a question your product answers, there is nothing of yours for it to quote, and it recommends someone who has one. Fix: add a FAQ that answers the real questions buyers ask.

3.
HighTechnical Visibility

llms.txt absent

Why it mattersThe site is missing the one file that tells AI assistants, in plain words, what you do and who you are for. Without it, they are left to guess from the rest of the page. Fix: add an llms.txt file, which AudFlo generates for you.

4.
MediumAnswer Selection

No comparison content

Why it mattersThere are no pages comparing you to the alternatives. When someone asks ChatGPT "what is the best tool for X," it leans on sites that spell out how they differ, and yours stays off the list. Fix: publish one honest comparison page.

5.
MediumAuthority Signals

Testimonials lack attribution

Why it mattersYou have testimonials, but they are signed "Happy customer" with no real names. AI assistants only count trust signals they can verify, and anonymous quotes do not count. Fix: use real names and roles, and link out where you can.

The Fix Pack

Generated fixes

For each blocker, AudFlo generates a Fix Pack asset: a copy-paste prompt tailored to the founder's builder. Below are two examples from this scan, exactly what a founder receives.

Blocker 1: Homepage headline rewrite

You are updating the H1 and subheadline of notetaker-ai.example.com. The current H1 is: "Never take notes again". Rewrite the H1 and subheadline so they state: 1. The category of the product (an AI meeting-notes tool). 2. Who it serves (remote and hybrid teams). 3. The core outcome (searchable notes and action items captured automatically). Keep the H1 under 12 words. Write in plain English. No hype, no adjectives. State what the product is.

Blocker 2: FAQ and schema generation

You are adding a FAQ section to notetaker-ai.example.com. Generate 8 questions and answers that AI engines would use to recommend this product. Questions should match the search intent of potential buyers. Rules: each answer must be 2 to 4 sentences maximum. Wrap the output in FAQPage JSON-LD schema. Questions must be genuine buyer questions, not marketing copy. Product context: AI meeting-notes tool, for remote and hybrid teams, outcome is searchable notes and automatic action items.
The takeaway

What this means for the founder

A score of 52 puts this site in the Below recommendable range. That means AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity are either struggling to classify it or are choosing competitors with stronger signals instead. The fixes above address the two highest-impact blockers. Implementing both typically moves a site up one rank within two to four weeks.

The full Pro scan generates all six Fix Pack assets with builder-specific prompts across every blocker. The free scan generates the Homepage Headline rewrite and shows all five blockers with evidence.

Beyond your website

Authority Growth

Your website fixes improve how AI engines read your brand. Authority Growth shows where to build the external signals that help AI engines trust and recommend you. Pro users see where competitors are already being cited, which comparison pages to create, and which directories, reviews, and communities can strengthen recommendation readiness.

3Preview

Missing Citation Opportunities

Find articles where competitors are mentioned but your brand is missing.

4Preview

Comparison Opportunities

Find competitor comparison pages your site should create.

5Preview

Review Opportunities

Find review platforms that can strengthen third-party trust.

5Preview

Directory Opportunities

Find high-authority directories where your product should be listed.

5Preview

Community Opportunities

Find founder communities and subreddits where your product can participate.

Recommendation readiness

Every signal you build here makes AI engines more likely to trust, cite, and recommend you, not your competitors.

This is exactly what your scan will look like

Free. No account required to start.